Skip to content
Faith Forge LabsFrance modernization notebookProject dossier

Read the maintaining authority, then document applicability

The reading room supports engineering questions. It does not make Faith Forge Labs a French legal, privacy, accessibility, cybersecurity, tax, or regulatory authority and does not certify a project.

Prepare the project brief
Review date
2026-07-31
Language
Official French sources
Use
Reviewed technical input

CNIL material informs the data backlog

Use the developer guide to frame privacy-by-design work and the tracker hub to review current cookie, pixel, measurement, and consent guidance. Record the exact system behavior and have the responsible owner determine what applies; do not reduce the decision to installing a banner.

  • Purpose and minimization
  • Actual browser and server behavior
  • Current guidance date
  • Qualified applicability decision

RGAA informs an accessibility test plan

The official reference provides criteria and methodology. Confirm whether and how it applies to the organization, then define representative routes, components, devices, assistive technologies, and human checks. A technical pass at a point in time is evidence, not an official declaration or enduring guarantee.

  • Scope and version
  • Automated plus human checks
  • Known limitations
  • Remediation and retest evidence

ANSSI informs security hygiene

Select relevant guides and tools for the system's risk, sector, and maturity. Source control, updates, access, secrets, backups, logging, incident response, and recovery are common engineering concerns. Faith Forge Labs does not imply ANSSI qualification or approval.

  • Risk-based selection
  • Version and review date
  • Implementation evidence
  • No endorsement language
working conclusion

Open the source with a concrete implementation question

State the audience, system, data behavior, component, organization context, and release decision that the source needs to inform.

Prepare the project brief